Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:07
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
‘The Bear’ Season 4 Finale Leaves Us With Plenty to Chew On - Rolling Stone
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Universe emerged from time, not from space? New theory shows how - Interesting Engineering
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump and Washington Are Making Tons of Noise. Why the Stock Market Will Be Just Fine. - Barron's
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Blue Diamond to close historic midtown Sacramento plant; 600 jobs affected - Sacramento Bee
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Man thought he was 'tired from work' before brain tumour diagnosis - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Fallout Shelter has been downloaded over 230 million times in 10 years - Eurogamer
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.